A DISCLAIMER REQUESTED BY THE BUSINESS MANAGER

"The views and opinions in this Blogspot are expressed by me in my capacity as an individual member and not in my capacity as a Union Officer. Likewise, comments by the other members on the Blogspot are individual expressions of their views. The views stated herein are not necessarily a reflection of Local 602. The Local has not seen or adopted my comments or the comments of others prior to posting. The Blogspot includes no expenditures of Union Funds."



Saturday, October 9, 2010

FROM OUR NEGOTIATING TEAM

October 8, 2010

RE: Update on Negotiations

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

Now that a strike is becoming more and more likely, I wanted to share with you how we got to this point and what it will take to avoid a strike.

The employers opened up negotiations four months ago with proposals to cut wages by more than $5.50 an hour and freezing wages at that level for three years. There has been much jockeying back and forth and posturing by the MCA but the employers were steadfast on two points. They wanted a three or four year contract. They also refused to budge from a package of $1.50 over two years. Initially, they offered $.55for year one followed by a $.95 cent increase. Later, they flipped those numbers to offer $.95 for year one and $.55 for year two. The MCA has never made a specific offer for the third year of the contract.

The employers have justified their position by pointing to the distressed economy and their fear for the future. The Local has countered by saying that the Washington Metropolitan Area has fared better than any other construction market. We also pointed out that the Steamfitters have weathered the economic down turn better than any other craft in the area. The hours for Local 602 have been essentially flat and unemployment has been relatively low. By comparison, other crafts have experienced unemployment levels as high as thirty per cent. Local 602’s success and the success of ur contractors is no accident. Local 602 has become the premier service local in the country, and Local 602 contractors have successfully maintained their hold in the construction sector. The industry has benefited by a superb training program, which is expanding into Virginia. Local 602 has also aggressively engaged in organizing, signing new contractors, marketing the industry and recruiting new members. As a consequence, Local 602 has been one of the fastest growing locals in the country. To be fair, this success has not been ours alone. We have benefited by contractors willing to rise to the challenge and grow the market. Our membership and signatory contractors have prospered together.

The contractors are mired in negativity. They also appeared to be anchored in the past in their determination to tie us in with the Plumbers. They have been fixated in keeping Local 602 to the same 2-year package that they secured from the Plumbers. We are reluctant to criticize the Plumbers in any way. They are our UA brothers and we wish them well. However, it would be wrong to overlook the fact that the Plumbers package for $1.50 over 2 years was not the result of robust bargaining. Rather, from all reports, the Plumbers got exactly what they asked for. The Steamfitters are situated differently and we deserve to be treated differently. It is no secret that the Plumbers had unemployment spike to as high as 30% over the past year. It is also common knowledge, as admitted by the MCA negotiators, that for various reasons the profit margins on plumbing jobs are razor slim. But we are not Plumbers. Far from it. The fixation by the MCA to join us at the hip with the Plumbers is folly and represents a fundamental obstacle to a new agreement.

The Pipefitters in other cities with straight line Locals separate fitter and plumbing locals in a locality) have been awarded higher wages. This is not the result of jealousy or one upmanship. Rather, this reflects the inescapable reality that fitters generate more income and their contractors have a greater market share than their Plumber counterparts.

Local 602 has shown forbearance in the face of the employer’s intransigence. We allowed the contract to expire without a general strike and patiently continued good faith negotiations. We filed election petitions with the NLRB to demonstrate our continued support and won each election overwhelmingly. We instituted one-day spot strikes to try to get the MCA to realize the seriousness of the situation.

We went further. Faced with continual carping from the employers that prior contracts had been turned down by the membership, the Local took the unprecedented step to pre‐ratify a 3 year agreement providing for $1.25 in year one, $1.50 in year 2, and a mechanism whereby the third year increase would be calculated by reference to the increase negotiated by the four Crafts with the highest total economic package in the area. We have presented this pre‐ratified proposal to the MCA to demonstrate that we have a proposal that has been thoroughly debated and then approved by the membership. This pre-ratified proposal was also sent out to all contractors on an individual basis as an interim agreement, inviting all that would sign to do so in order to insulate themselves from any strike that might ensue.

Lest the Local’s continued efforts to secure a contract be confused with weakness, the Local has taken parallel steps to demonstrate its fortitude and willingness to engage in a General strike if the employers respond to bargaining efforts. These steps have included:

1. Obtaining authorization for the membership to engage in a strike.

2. The cancellation of the Cause Agreement, which contained a no, strike clause.

3. The transfer of $500,000.00 from the general fund to a strike fund.

4. The passage of an assessment to commence October 13, 2010 of $2.00 for every straight time hour worked and $4.00 an hour for every overtime hour worked so that those who continue to work for employers who are not struck because they are subject to a PLA, or a UA National Agreement, an Interim Agreement or that are not struck because of a strategic judgment of the Local will contribute to the effort. This will allow the Local to replenish the strike fund and share the burden of a strike.

Where do we go from here and how can a strike be avoided? The answer lies with the MCA. They can accept our pre‐ratified offer, which is the quickest, surest and best avenue to secure labor peace. Or, in the alternative they can make a serious counter‐offer that beaks the unwise pattern bargaining approach adopted by the MCA and offers an agreement that is fair to both sides and capable of ratification. We have reached a critical juncture, a defining moment. We have agreed to meet with the MCA on Tuesday, October 12, 2010 and will be prepared to negotiate as long as it takes, all day and into the night, to reach an acceptable agreement. If such an agreement is reached, a strike will not be called pending further ratification if necessary.

One more thing. Expect dirty tricks, intimidation, threats and every ploy imaginable by the contractors to try to break your resolve. They cannot help themselves. We are fighting the good fight. I know that the membership will stand united, will not flinch and will prevail.

Fraternally,

Joseph C. Savia, Sr. Business Manager/Financial Secretary/Treasurer
Daniel W. Loveless Assistant Business Manager
William Durkin Organizer/Business Representative
Kevin Sullivan Business Agent

2 comments:

  1. John,
    The views and opinions in this comment are expressed by me in my capacity as an individual member and not in my capacity as an employee of an MCA contractor. The views stated herein are not necessarily a reflection of Local 602. The Local has not seen or adopted my comments or the comments of others prior to posting, though I have shared some of them with Kevin Sullivan and Bill Durkin.

    I believe an employer has a moral responsibility to provide his/her employees an adequate income to allow comfortable living. A couple of weeks ago I went the Labor Department's web site and various links from to get some information. I found that all union labor in DC accounts for an average of 32% of the workforce. The government sector was the highest of the group at 48% and the private sector was around 12%. The average blue collar worker in the US makes $18/hr. The average pipefitter makes $22/hr. A senior pipefitter in DC averages $30/hr. The average cost of living in the US is $13.56/hr, in MD - $18.27/hr, in VA - $16.75/hr. The numbers listed above are "total package". At our base pay of $36+/hr + benefits I believe the contractors have exceeded their responsibility.

    The shortages that we are facing are not the contractors' fault or responsibility. We, as a body, decide where the monies we receive are allocated. We made those choices in the past and should be willing to bear the consequences of those choices rather than pass them on to someone else to bail us out.
    (cont'd)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pt. II
    Most of the fitters I have spoken with would be willing to keep the rate we are currently at, keep working, keep the customers satisfied and face the questionable economic future with the knowledge that we have not done anything to harm the industry, the customers or the contractors we work for.

    Bernie mentioned at one of the meetings that 602 has always had high employment because our wages were not high. With high employment all our funding is self-sustaining. If we hold out for higher wages we will further reduce our market share in the DC area, increase unemployment and decrease the needed contributions to our funds.

    I believe setting up the strike fund at this stage in the negotiations was foolish and show-boating. That should have been done two years ago when it didn't appear to be an act of desperation. I think it should be tabled until after a new agreement has been signed and everyone's feelings are no longer hurt.
    The contractor's have offered to help us with our funding problem, more than I would have expected. We should have accepted their offer, we still should.
    I understand negotiations always start with the sky but they should get to realistic quickly. I would like to think if the members were given facts they might be a little more accepting to the contractor's current offer.
    The purpose of our union is to provide its members with the training to perform professionally in our trade and receive a fair wage for that performance. It is not to run roughshod over another body just to get our way.
    I am not one of the bootlick lackies, apologists, or company men you mentioned above but a 30-year fitter who has always tried to perform in a manner that would enhance the value of Local 602 in the eyes of the contractor and the customer. I am also a person who is not willing to take something away from someone else just because our numbers are large enough to make it happen.
    If a strike is called I will honor it because I swore an oath to abide the by-laws. I am stating unequivocally that I disagree with this strike and that it should not happen.

    Rusty Mack

    ReplyDelete